↓ Skip to main content

Basal Infusion versus Automated Boluses and a Delayed Start Timer for “Continuous” Sciatic Nerve Blocks after Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basal Infusion versus Automated Boluses and a Delayed Start Timer for “Continuous” Sciatic Nerve Blocks after Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Anesthesiology, May 2022
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000004189
Pubmed ID
Authors

John J. Finneran, Engy T. Said, Brian P. Curran, Matthew W. Swisher, Jessica R. Black, Rodney A. Gabriel, Jacklynn F. Sztain, Wendy B. Abramson, Brenton Alexander, Michael C. Donohue, Adam Schaar, Brian M. Ilfeld

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,066,026
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#364
of 6,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,257
of 449,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.