The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Basal Infusion versus Automated Boluses and a Delayed Start Timer for “Continuous” Sciatic Nerve Blocks after Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anesthesiology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aln.0000000000004189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John J. Finneran, Engy T. Said, Brian P. Curran, Matthew W. Swisher, Jessica R. Black, Rodney A. Gabriel, Jacklynn F. Sztain, Wendy B. Abramson, Brenton Alexander, Michael C. Donohue, Adam Schaar, Brian M. Ilfeld |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 23% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,061,163
of 26,383,000 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#360
of 6,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,039
of 451,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.