Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker, Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire, Simone Nascimento Dos Santos, Monica Luiza de Alcantara, Mohamed Hassan Saleh, Armando Luis Cantisano, José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro, Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto, Salomon Israel do Amaral, Orlando Carlos Gloria Veloso, Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco, Fanilda Souto Barros, Márcio Vinícius Lins de Barros, Adriano José de Souza, Marcone Lima Sobreira, Robson Barbosa de Miranda, Domingos de Moraes, Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro, Alexandre Dias Mançano, Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima, Valdair Francisco Muglia, Cristina Sebastião Matushita, Rafael Willain Lopes, Artur Martins Novaes Coutinho, Diego Bromfman Pianta, Alair Augusto Sarmet Moreira Damas Dos Santos, Bruno de Lima Naves, Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#208,448
of 26,731,031 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#4
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,103
of 456,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,731,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
