You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brain functional networks in syndromic and non-syndromic autism: a graph theoretical study of EEG connectivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-54 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jurriaan M Peters, Maxime Taquet, Clemente Vega, Shafali S Jeste, Iván Sánchez Fernández, Jacqueline Tan, Charles A Nelson, Mustafa Sahin, Simon K Warfield |
| Abstract |
Graph theory has been recently introduced to characterize complex brain networks, making it highly suitable to investigate altered connectivity in neurologic disorders. A current model proposes autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as a developmental disconnection syndrome, supported by converging evidence in both non-syndromic and syndromic ASD. However, the effects of abnormal connectivity on network properties have not been well studied, particularly in syndromic ASD. To close this gap, brain functional networks of electroencephalographic (EEG) connectivity were studied through graph measures in patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), a disorder with a high prevalence of ASD, as well as in patients with non-syndromic ASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 7 | 33% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 354 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 21% |
| Researcher | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
| Professor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 63 | 17% |
| Psychology | 61 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 16% |
| Engineering | 32 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#967,544
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#674
of 3,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,036
of 195,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#21
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.