You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Label-Based Automatic Alignment of Video with Narrative Sentences
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 43 |
Book title |
Computer Vision – ECCV 2016 Workshops
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-46604-0_43 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-946603-3, 978-3-31-946604-0
|
Authors |
Pelin Dogan, Markus Gross, Jean-Charles Bazin, Dogan, Pelin, Gross, Markus, Bazin, Jean-Charles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,579,758
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,492
of 8,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,811
of 320,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#159
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.