↓ Skip to main content

Beyond GWAS of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence of Interaction with Alcohol Consumption and Putative Causal Variant for the 10q24.2 Region

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond GWAS of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence of Interaction with Alcohol Consumption and Putative Causal Variant for the 10q24.2 Region
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2022
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina M. Jordahl, Anna Shcherbina, Andre E. Kim, Yu-Ru Su, Yi Lin, Jun Wang, Conghui Qu, Demetrius Albanes, Volker Arndt, James W. Baurley, Sonja I. Berndt, Stephanie A. Bien, D. Timothy Bishop, Emmanouil Bouras, Hermann Brenner, Daniel D. Buchanan, Arif Budiarto, Peter T. Campbell, Robert Carreras-Torres, Graham Casey, Tjeng Wawan Cenggoro, Andrew T. Chan, David V. Conti, Christopher H. Dampier, Matthew A. Devall, Virginia Díez-Obrero, Niki Dimou, David A. Drew, Jane C. Figueiredo, Steven Gallinger, Graham G. Giles, Stephen B. Gruber, Andrea Gsur, Marc J. Gunter, Heather Hampel, Sophia Harlid, Tabitha A. Harrison, Akihisa Hidaka, Michael Hoffmeister, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Mark A. Jenkins, Amit D. Joshi, Temitope O. Keku, Susanna C. Larsson, Loic Le Marchand, Juan Pablo Lewinger, Li, Bharuno Mahesworo, Victor Moreno, John L. Morrison, Neil Murphy, Hongmei Nan, Rami Nassir, Polly A. Newcomb, Mireia Obón-Santacana, Shuji Ogino, Jennifer Ose, Rish K. Pai, Julie R. Palmer, Nikos Papadimitriou, Bens Pardamean, Anita R. Peoples, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Elizabeth A. Platz, John D. Potter, Ross L. Prentice, Gad Rennert, Edward Ruiz-Narvaez, Lori C. Sakoda, Peter C. Scacheri, Stephanie L. Schmit, Robert E. Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Mariana C. Stern, Catherine M. Tangen, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Duncan C. Thomas, Yu Tian, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Franzel J.B. van Duijnhoven, Bethany Van Guelpen, Kala Visvanathan, Pavel Vodicka, Emily White, Alicja Wolk, Michael O. Woods, Anna H. Wu, Natalia Zemlianskaia, Jenny Chang-Claude, W. James Gauderman, Li Hsu, Anshul Kundaje, Ulrike Peters

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,491,901
of 21,454,959 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,738
of 4,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,588
of 335,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#21
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,454,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.