You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stability of Zika virus in urine: Specimen processing considerations and implications for the detection of RNA targets in urine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Virological Methods, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.04.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanna K. Tan, Malaya K. Sahoo, Stephen B. Milligan, Nathaniel Taylor, Benjamin A. Pinsky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virological Methods
#1,087
of 3,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,027
of 327,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virological Methods
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.