↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Friedreich’s Ataxia on health-care resource utilization in the United Kingdom and Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Friedreich’s Ataxia on health-care resource utilization in the United Kingdom and Germany
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Giunti, Julia Greenfield, Alison J Stevenson, Michael H Parkinson, Jodie L Hartmann, Ruediger Sandtmann, James Piercy, Jamie O’Hara, Leo Ruiz Casas, Fiona M Smith

Abstract

Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA) is a neurodegenerative disorder that causes progressive damage to the central and peripheral nervous systems having a significant impact upon quality of life. With little information in the literature, cross-sectional observational studies were conducted in the UK and Germany to collect data on resource use and the burden of the disease on individuals and their caregivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,433,518
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#296
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,344
of 205,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.