↓ Skip to main content

Efficient Methods for Targeted Mutagenesis in Zebrafish Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases: Data from Targeting of Nine Genes Using CompoZr or CoDA ZFNs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficient Methods for Targeted Mutagenesis in Zebrafish Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases: Data from Targeting of Nine Genes Using CompoZr or CoDA ZFNs
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raman Sood, Blake Carrington, Kevin Bishop, MaryPat Jones, Alberto Rissone, Fabio Candotti, Settara C. Chandrasekharappa, Paul Liu

Abstract

Recently, it has been shown that targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) can be used to generate knockout zebrafish lines for analysis of their function and/or developing disease models. A number of different methods have been developed for the design and assembly of gene-specific ZFNs and TALENs, making them easily available to most zebrafish researchers. Regardless of the choice of targeting nuclease, the process of generating mutant fish is similar. It is a time-consuming and multi-step process that can benefit significantly from development of efficient high throughput methods. In this study, we used ZFNs assembled through either the CompoZr (Sigma-Aldrich) or the CoDA (context-dependent assembly) platforms to generate mutant zebrafish for nine genes. We report our improved high throughput methods for 1) evaluation of ZFNs activity by somatic lesion analysis using colony PCR, eliminating the need for plasmid DNA extractions from a large number of clones, and 2) a sensitive founder screening strategy using fluorescent PCR with PIG-tailed primers that eliminates the stutter bands and accurately identifies even single nucleotide insertions and deletions. Using these protocols, we have generated multiple mutant alleles for seven genes, five of which were targeted with CompoZr ZFNs and two with CoDA ZFNs. Our data also revealed that at least five-fold higher mRNA dose was required to achieve mutagenesis with CoDA ZFNs than with CompoZr ZFNs, and their somatic lesion frequency was lower (<5%) when compared to CopmoZr ZFNs (9-98%). This work provides high throughput protocols for efficient generation of zebrafish mutants using ZFNs and TALENs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
India 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 14 21%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 25%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,379,406
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,638
of 193,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,646
of 192,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,720
of 5,396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.