You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dental extractions prior to radiotherapy to the jaws for reducing post‐radiotherapy dental complications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008857.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiyana Eliyas, Ahmed Al‐Khayatt, Richard WJ Porter, Peter Briggs |
| Abstract |
Radiotherapy as part of head and neck cancer treatment leaves patients requiring much dental rehabilitation in a compromised environment that is difficult for the patient and the dental team to manage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 21% |
| Spain | 6 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 30% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 67 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,854,805
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,996
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,316
of 205,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.