↓ Skip to main content

Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009296.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten C Kuethe, Anja A P H Vaessen-Verberne, Roy G Elbers, Wim MC Van Aalderen

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and prevalence is also high in adulthood, thereby placing a considerable burden on healthcare resources. Therefore, effective asthma management is important to reduce morbidity and to optimise utilisation of healthcare facilities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 135 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 24%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 21 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#760,113
of 12,640,715 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,588
of 10,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,633
of 143,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,640,715 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.