↓ Skip to main content

Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009296.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten C Kuethe, Anja A P H Vaessen-Verberne, Roy G Elbers, Wim MC Van Aalderen

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and prevalence is also high in adulthood, thereby placing a considerable burden on healthcare resources. Therefore, effective asthma management is important to reduce morbidity and to optimise utilisation of healthcare facilities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 16 9%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 27%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 34 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,088,520
of 16,600,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,922
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,279
of 154,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,600,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.