The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Amphibian mucus triggers a developmental transition in the frog-killing chytrid fungus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristyn A Robinson, Sarah M Prostak, Evan H Campbell Grant, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 27 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 23% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,610,272
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#4,076
of 15,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,873
of 452,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#78
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.