↓ Skip to main content

Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005147.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Morriss, Indira Vinjamuri, Mohammad Amir Faizal, Catherine A Bolton, James P McCarthy

Abstract

Schizophrenia has a lifetime prevalence of less than one per cent. Studies have indicated that early symptoms that are idiosyncratic to the person with schizophrenia (early warning signs) often precede acute psychotic relapse. Early warning signs interventions propose that learning to detect and manage early warning signs of impending relapse might prevent or delay acute psychotic relapse.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 22%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 15%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 35%
Psychology 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 14%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 31 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,233,776
of 12,667,610 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,158
of 10,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,681
of 143,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,667,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.