You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuroimmune cardiovascular interfaces control atherosclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-022-04673-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarajo K. Mohanta, Li Peng, Yuanfang Li, Shu Lu, Ting Sun, Lorenzo Carnevale, Marialuisa Perrotta, Zhe Ma, Benjamin Förstera, Karen Stanic, Chuankai Zhang, Xi Zhang, Piotr Szczepaniak, Mariaelvy Bianchini, Borhan R. Saeed, Raimondo Carnevale, Desheng Hu, Ryszard Nosalski, Fabio Pallante, Michael Beer, Donato Santovito, Ali Ertürk, Thomas C. Mettenleiter, Barbara G. Klupp, Remco T. A. Megens, Sabine Steffens, Jaroslav Pelisek, Hans-Henning Eckstein, Robert Kleemann, Livia Habenicht, Ziad Mallat, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Jürgen Bernhagen, Martin Dichgans, Giuseppe D’Agostino, Tomasz J. Guzik, Peder S. Olofsson, Changjun Yin, Christian Weber, Giuseppe Lembo, Daniela Carnevale, Andreas J. R. Habenicht |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 255 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 | 26% |
| Germany | 24 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Sweden | 5 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 93 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 134 | 53% |
| Scientists | 89 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#88,536
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,262
of 98,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,755
of 449,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#170
of 1,032 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,032 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.