↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004536.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesl Grobler, Nandi Siegfried, Marianne E Visser, Sarah SN Mahlungulu, Jimmy Volmink

Abstract

Adequate nutrition is important for optimal immune and metabolic function. Dietary support may, therefore, improve clinical outcomes in HIV-infected individuals by reducing the incidence of HIV-associated complications and attenuating progression of HIV disease, improving quality of life and ultimately reducing disease-related mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 302 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 24%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 54 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2018.
All research outputs
#783,670
of 12,627,642 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,646
of 10,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,937
of 143,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,627,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.