You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A Review with a Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Item Content and Factor Structure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0058067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Nicholas Carleton, Michel A. Thibodeau, Michelle J. N. Teale, Patrick G. Welch, Murray P. Abrams, Thomas Robinson, Gordon J. G. Asmundson |
| Abstract |
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) is a commonly used freely available self-report measure of depressive symptoms. Despite its popularity, several recent investigations have called into question the robustness and suitability of the commonly used 4-factor 20-item CES-D model. The goal of the current study was to address these concerns by confirming the factorial validity of the CES-D. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 423 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 10% |
| Researcher | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 10% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 96 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 111 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 119 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,496,406
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,102
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,003
of 210,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,351
of 5,363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.