↓ Skip to main content

Akt Regulates TNFα Synthesis Downstream of RIP1 Kinase Activation during Necroptosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Akt Regulates TNFα Synthesis Downstream of RIP1 Kinase Activation during Necroptosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen R. McNamara, Ruchita Ahuja, Awo D. Osafo-Addo, Douglas Barrows, Arminja Kettenbach, Igor Skidan, Xin Teng, Gregory D. Cuny, Scott Gerber, Alexei Degterev

Abstract

Necroptosis is a regulated form of necrotic cell death that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases including intestinal inflammation and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). In this work, we investigated the signaling mechanisms controlled by the necroptosis mediator receptor interacting protein-1 (RIP1) kinase. We show that Akt kinase activity is critical for necroptosis in L929 cells and plays a key role in TNFα production. During necroptosis, Akt is activated in a RIP1 dependent fashion through its phosphorylation on Thr308. In L929 cells, this activation requires independent signaling inputs from both growth factors and RIP1. Akt controls necroptosis through downstream targeting of mammalian Target of Rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Akt activity, mediated in part through mTORC1, links RIP1 to JNK activation and autocrine production of TNFα. In other cell types, such as mouse lung fibroblasts and macrophages, Akt exhibited control over necroptosis-associated TNFα production without contributing to cell death. Overall, our results provide new insights into the mechanism of necroptosis and the role of Akt kinase in both cell death and inflammatory regulation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 3%
Norway 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,184,694
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,949
of 193,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,404
of 194,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,346
of 5,313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.