↓ Skip to main content

White-nose syndrome is likely to extirpate the endangered Indiana bat over large parts of its range

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
White-nose syndrome is likely to extirpate the endangered Indiana bat over large parts of its range
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.010
Authors

Wayne E. Thogmartin, Carol A. Sanders-Reed, Jennifer A. Szymanski, Patrick C. McKann, Lori Pruitt, R. Andrew King, Michael C. Runge, Robin E. Russell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Master 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 13 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 50%
Environmental Science 35 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 18 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,755,094
of 21,324,218 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,464
of 5,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,123
of 169,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#22
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,324,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.