↓ Skip to main content

Bushmeat hunting and extinction risk to the world's mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Royal Society Open Science, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,693)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
85 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bushmeat hunting and extinction risk to the world's mammals
Published in
Royal Society Open Science, October 2016
DOI 10.1098/rsos.160498
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J. Ripple, Katharine Abernethy, Matthew G. Betts, Guillaume Chapron, Rodolfo Dirzo, Mauro Galetti, Taal Levi, Peter A. Lindsey, David W. Macdonald, Brian Machovina, Thomas M. Newsome, Carlos A. Peres, Arian D. Wallach, Christopher Wolf, Hillary Young

Abstract

Terrestrial mammals are experiencing a massive collapse in their population sizes and geographical ranges around the world, but many of the drivers, patterns and consequences of this decline remain poorly understood. Here we provide an analysis showing that bushmeat hunting for mostly food and medicinal products is driving a global crisis whereby 301 terrestrial mammal species are threatened with extinction. Nearly all of these threatened species occur in developing countries where major coexisting threats include deforestation, agricultural expansion, human encroachment and competition with livestock. The unrelenting decline of mammals suggests many vital ecological and socio-economic services that these species provide will be lost, potentially changing ecosystems irrevocably. We discuss options and current obstacles to achieving effective conservation, alongside consequences of failure to stem such anthropogenic mammalian extirpation. We propose a multi-pronged conservation strategy to help save threatened mammals from immediate extinction and avoid a collapse of food security for hundreds of millions of people.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 247 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 21%
Researcher 48 19%
Student > Master 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Unspecified 23 9%
Other 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 46%
Environmental Science 77 30%
Unspecified 32 12%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 17 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 565. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,652
of 12,388,051 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#27
of 1,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#747
of 275,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#3
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,388,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.