↓ Skip to main content

Identifying monitoring information needs that support the management of fish in large rivers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying monitoring information needs that support the management of fish in large rivers
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2022
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0267113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy D. Counihan, Kristen L. Bouska, Shannon K. Brewer, Robert B. Jacobson, Andrew F. Casper, Colin G. Chapman, Ian R. Waite, Kenneth R. Sheehan, Mark Pyron, Elise R. Irwin, Karen Riva-Murray, Alexa J. McKerrow, Jennifer M. Bayer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Librarian 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#12,598,594
of 21,339,655 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#96,517
of 182,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,982
of 281,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,194
of 2,229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,339,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.