↓ Skip to main content

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000396.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pepijn DDM Roelofs, Rick A Deyo, Bart W Koes, Rob JPM Scholten, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low-back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low-back pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 302 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 18%
Student > Master 44 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Other 34 11%
Researcher 33 10%
Other 75 24%
Unknown 36 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 46 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#314,087
of 15,840,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#731
of 11,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,631
of 152,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,840,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.