↓ Skip to main content

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
17 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000396.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pepijn DDM Roelofs, Rick A Deyo, Bart W Koes, Rob JPM Scholten, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low-back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low-back pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 272 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 17%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Other 34 12%
Researcher 33 12%
Other 97 34%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 156 55%
Unspecified 34 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#235,124
of 13,505,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#590
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,270
of 145,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.