↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Inflammatory Injury Results in Increased Coupling of Delta Opioid Receptors to Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Inflammatory Injury Results in Increased Coupling of Delta Opioid Receptors to Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels
Published in
Molecular Pain, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-9-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amynah Pradhan, Monique Smith, Brenna McGuire, Christopher Evans, Wendy Walwyn

Abstract

Opioid receptors regulate a diverse array of physiological functions. Mu opioid receptor agonists are well-known analgesics for treating acute pain. In contrast, animal models suggest that chronic pain is more effectively relieved by delta opioid receptor agonists. A number of studies have shown that chronic pain results in increased function of delta opioid receptors. This is proposed to result from enhanced trafficking of the delta opioid receptor to the cell membrane induced by persistent tissue injury. However, recent studies have questioned this mechanism, which has resulted in some uncertainty as to whether delta opioid receptors are indeed upregulated in chronic pain states. To clarify this question, we have examined the effect of chronic inflammatory pain over time using both an ex vivo measure of delta function: receptor-Ca2+ channel coupling, and an in vivo measure; the relief of chronic pain by a delta opioid receptor agonist. In addition, as beta-arrestin 2 can regulate delta opioid receptor trafficking and signaling, we have further examined whether deleting this scaffolding and signal transduction molecule alters delta opioid receptor function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 32%
Neuroscience 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,294,968
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#147
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,621
of 290,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.