Title |
Chronic Inflammatory Injury Results in Increased Coupling of Delta Opioid Receptors to Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Pain, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-8069-9-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amynah Pradhan, Monique Smith, Brenna McGuire, Christopher Evans, Wendy Walwyn |
Abstract |
Opioid receptors regulate a diverse array of physiological functions. Mu opioid receptor agonists are well-known analgesics for treating acute pain. In contrast, animal models suggest that chronic pain is more effectively relieved by delta opioid receptor agonists. A number of studies have shown that chronic pain results in increased function of delta opioid receptors. This is proposed to result from enhanced trafficking of the delta opioid receptor to the cell membrane induced by persistent tissue injury. However, recent studies have questioned this mechanism, which has resulted in some uncertainty as to whether delta opioid receptors are indeed upregulated in chronic pain states. To clarify this question, we have examined the effect of chronic inflammatory pain over time using both an ex vivo measure of delta function: receptor-Ca2+ channel coupling, and an in vivo measure; the relief of chronic pain by a delta opioid receptor agonist. In addition, as beta-arrestin 2 can regulate delta opioid receptor trafficking and signaling, we have further examined whether deleting this scaffolding and signal transduction molecule alters delta opioid receptor function. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 32% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 14% |