↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Sabiá virus infections (Brazilian mammarenavirus)

Overview of attention for article published in Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding Sabiá virus infections (Brazilian mammarenavirus)
Published in
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, July 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Catharina Nastri, Amaro Nunes Duarte-Neto, Luciana Vilas Boas Casadio, William Marciel de Souza, Ingra M. Claro, Erika R. Manuli, Gloria Selegatto, Matias C. Salomão, Gabriel Fialkovitz, Mariane Taborda, Bianca Leal de Almeida, Marcello C. Magri, Ana Rúbia Guedes, Lauro Vieira Perdigão Neto, Fatima Mitie Sataki, Thais Guimarães, Maria Cassia Mendes-Correa, Tania R. Tozetto-Mendoza, Marcilio Jorge Fumagalli, Yeh-Li Ho, Camila Alves Maia da Silva, Thaís M. Coletti, Jaqueline Goes de Jesus, Camila M. Romano, Sarah C. Hill, Oliver Pybus, João Renato Rebello Pinho, Felipe Lourenço Ledesma, Yuri R. Casal, Cristina T. Kanamura, Leonardo José Tadeu de Araújo, Camila Santos da Silva Ferreira, Juliana Mariotti Guerra, Luiz Tadeu Moraes Figueiredo, Marisa Dolhnikoff, Nuno R. Faria, Ester C. Sabino, Venâncio Avancini Ferreira Alves, Anna S. Levin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 10 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,111,564
of 25,243,918 outputs
Outputs from Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
#96
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,146
of 431,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.