↓ Skip to main content

Devastating Decline of Forest Elephants in Central Africa

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
86 news outlets
blogs
34 blogs
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
164 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
598 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Devastating Decline of Forest Elephants in Central Africa
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Maisels, Samantha Strindberg, Stephen Blake, George Wittemyer, John Hart, Elizabeth A. Williamson, Rostand Aba’a, Gaspard Abitsi, Ruffin D. Ambahe, Fidèl Amsini, Parfait C. Bakabana, Thurston Cleveland Hicks, Rosine E. Bayogo, Martha Bechem, Rene L. Beyers, Anicet N. Bezangoye, Patrick Boundja, Nicolas Bout, Marc Ella Akou, Lambert Bene Bene, Bernard Fosso, Elizabeth Greengrass, Falk Grossmann, Clement Ikamba-Nkulu, Omari Ilambu, Bila-Isia Inogwabini, Fortune Iyenguet, Franck Kiminou, Max Kokangoye, Deo Kujirakwinja, Stephanie Latour, Innocent Liengola, Quevain Mackaya, Jacob Madidi, Bola Madzoke, Calixte Makoumbou, Guy-Aimé Malanda, Richard Malonga, Olivier Mbani, Valentin A. Mbendzo, Edgar Ambassa, Albert Ekinde, Yves Mihindou, Bethan J. Morgan, Prosper Motsaba, Gabin Moukala, Anselme Mounguengui, Brice S. Mowawa, Christian Ndzai, Stuart Nixon, Pele Nkumu, Fabian Nzolani, Lilian Pintea, Andrew Plumptre, Hugo Rainey, Bruno Bokoto de Semboli, Adeline Serckx, Emma Stokes, Andrea Turkalo, Hilde Vanleeuwe, Ashley Vosper, Ymke Warren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 598 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 575 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 94 16%
Researcher 93 16%
Student > Master 88 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 14%
Other 32 5%
Other 94 16%
Unknown 112 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 200 33%
Environmental Science 184 31%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 2%
Other 43 7%
Unknown 120 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1063. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,995
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#217
of 225,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61
of 208,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#7
of 5,401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.