You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mismatch Negativity/P3a Complex in Young People with Psychiatric Disorders: A Cluster Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0051871 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manreena Kaur, Jim Lagopoulos, Philip B. Ward, Tamara L. Watson, Sharon L. Naismith, Ian B. Hickie, Daniel F. Hermens |
| Abstract |
We have recently shown that the event-related potential biomarkers, mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a, are similarly impaired in young patients with schizophrenia- and affective-spectrum psychoses as well as those with bipolar disorder. A data driven approach may help to further elucidate novel patterns of MMN/P3a amplitudes that characterise distinct subgroups in patients with emerging psychiatric disorders. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,331,227
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,029
of 193,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,554
of 278,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,544
of 4,824 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,824 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.