↓ Skip to main content

Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009030.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chalmer J, Blakeway M, Adams Z, Milan SJ

Abstract

Immobilisation and early motion (protected or unrestricted) are both used following hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 33%
Other 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,931,446
of 6,287,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,997
of 7,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,715
of 98,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,287,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 52nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.