↓ Skip to main content

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
86 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010853.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith M Smart, Michael C Ferraro, Benedict M Wand, Neil E O'Connell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 290 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 7%
Other 16 6%
Student > Master 15 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 5%
Unspecified 13 4%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 162 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Unspecified 12 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 168 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#674,650
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,178
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,787
of 448,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.