You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Functionally Relevant Tool for the Body following Spinal Cord Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0058312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariella Pazzaglia, Giulia Galli, Giorgio Scivoletto, Marco Molinari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Hungary | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 18 | 18% |
| Psychology | 17 | 17% |
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,210,931
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,343
of 221,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,871
of 208,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#338
of 5,418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.