You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does “Science” Make You Moral? The Effects of Priming Science on Moral Judgments and Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0057989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Ma-Kellams, Jim Blascovich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 7% |
| Canada | 11 | 5% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 82 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 167 | 69% |
| Scientists | 59 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 147 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 57 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 395. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#78,542
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,303
of 225,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409
of 208,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#25
of 5,413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.