↓ Skip to main content

Purinergic Receptor Stimulation Reduces Cytotoxic Edema and Brain Infarcts in Mouse Induced by Photothrombosis by Energizing Glial Mitochondria

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Purinergic Receptor Stimulation Reduces Cytotoxic Edema and Brain Infarcts in Mouse Induced by Photothrombosis by Energizing Glial Mitochondria
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Zheng, Lora Talley Watts, Deborah M. Holstein, Suresh I. Prajapati, Charles Keller, Eileen H. Grass, Christi A. Walter, James D. Lechleiter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
China 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Professor 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Neuroscience 12 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,330,639
of 25,008,338 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#84,165
of 216,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,302
of 194,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#378
of 1,107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,008,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.