You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current Integration of Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV Services in South Africa, 2011
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0057791 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel C. Chehab, Amanda K. Vilakazi-Nhlapo, Peter Vranken, Annatjie Peters, Jeffrey D. Klausner |
| Abstract |
Public Health Facilities in South Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,633,332
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#127,805
of 224,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,342
of 208,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,522
of 5,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.