↓ Skip to main content

LRRK2 inhibitors and their potential in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LRRK2 inhibitors and their potential in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: current perspectives
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s102191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farzaneh Atashrazm, Nicolas Dzamko

Abstract

Major advances in understanding how genetics underlies Parkinson's disease (PD) have provided new opportunities for understanding disease pathogenesis and potential new targets for therapeutic intervention. One such target is leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), an enigmatic enzyme implicated in both familial and idiopathic PD risk. Both academia and industry have promoted the development of potent and selective inhibitors of LRRK2, and these are currently being employed to assess the safety and efficacy of such compounds in preclinical models of PD. This review examines the evidence that LRRK2 kinase activity contributes to the pathogenesis of PD and outlines recent progress on inhibitor development and early results from preclinical safety and efficacy testing. This review also looks at some of the challenges remaining for translation of LRRK2 inhibitors to the clinic, if indeed this is ultimately warranted. As a disease with no current cure that is increasing in prevalence in line with an aging population, there is much need for developing new treatments for PD, and targeting LRRK2 is currently a promising option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 18%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,166,546
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#67
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,146
of 335,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.