↓ Skip to main content

Meat consumption and mortality - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 3,182)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
708 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meat consumption and mortality - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-63
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:no-uit_munin_5734
Authors

Sabine Rohrmann, Kim Overvad, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Marianne U Jakobsen, Rikke Egeberg, Anne Tjønneland, Laura Nailler, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Vittorio Krogh, Domenico Palli, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Manuela M Bergmann, Heiner Boeing, Kuanrong Li, Rudolf Kaaks, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas J Wareham, Francesca L Crowe, Timothy J Key, Androniki Naska, Antonia Trichopoulou, Dimitirios Trichopoulos, Max Leenders, Petra HM Peeters, Dagrun Engeset, Christine L Parr, Guri Skeie, Paula Jakszyn, María-José Sánchez, José M Huerta, M Luisa Redondo, Aurelio Barricarte, Pilar Amiano, Isabel Drake, Emily Sonestedt, Göran Hallmans, Ingegerd Johansson, Veronika Fedirko, Isabelle Romieux, Pietro Ferrari, Teresa Norat, Anne C Vergnaud, Elio Riboli, Jakob Linseisen

Abstract

Recently, some US cohorts have shown a moderate association between red and processed meat consumption and mortality supporting the results of previous studies among vegetarians. The aim of this study was to examine the association of red meat, processed meat, and poultry consumption with the risk of early death in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 627 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 708 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 671 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 127 18%
Student > Bachelor 117 17%
Researcher 95 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 11%
Other 44 6%
Other 135 19%
Unknown 110 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 6%
Psychology 34 5%
Other 149 21%
Unknown 137 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#9,780
of 21,747,565 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#13
of 3,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 171,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,747,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them