↓ Skip to main content

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000332.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Luis H Agreda-Pérez, Ivan Solà

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and systemic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the small joints of the hands and feet. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have been used to treat anemia, one of the extra-articular manifestations of RA. Although anemia is less of a problem now because of the reduction in inflammation due to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), it could still be an issue in countries where DMARDs are not yet accessible.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
South Africa 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Unspecified 14 18%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 52%
Unspecified 17 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#864,033
of 12,826,501 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,817
of 10,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,851
of 143,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,826,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.