↓ Skip to main content

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS): a systematic review of anatomy and potential risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in Dynamic Medicine, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
813 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS): a systematic review of anatomy and potential risk factors
Published in
Dynamic Medicine, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1476-5918-7-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory R Waryasz, Ann Y McDermott

Abstract

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS), a common cause of anterior knee pain, is successfully treated in over 2/3 of patients through rehabilitation protocols designed to reduce pain and return function to the individual. Applying preventive medicine strategies, the majority of cases of PFPS may be avoided if a pre-diagnosis can be made by clinician or certified athletic trainer testing the current researched potential risk factors during a Preparticipation Screening Evaluation (PPSE). We provide a detailed and comprehensive review of the soft tissue, arterial system, and innervation to the patellofemoral joint in order to supply the clinician with the knowledge required to assess the anatomy and make recommendations to patients identified as potentially at risk. The purpose of this article is to review knee anatomy and the literature regarding potential risk factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome and prehabilitation strategies. A comprehensive review of knee anatomy will present the relationships of arterial collateralization, innervations, and soft tissue alignment to the possible multifactoral mechanism involved in PFPS, while attempting to advocate future use of different treatments aimed at non-soft tissue causes of PFPS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 813 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
Chile 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 784 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 168 21%
Student > Bachelor 166 20%
Student > Postgraduate 65 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 6%
Other 156 19%
Unknown 147 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 305 38%
Sports and Recreations 131 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 122 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 3%
Social Sciences 12 1%
Other 55 7%
Unknown 163 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,634,762
of 23,923,403 outputs
Outputs from Dynamic Medicine
#5
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,902
of 84,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dynamic Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them