↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007214.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese Dowswell, Carol Bedwell, Tina Lavender, James P Neilson

Abstract

Transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) has been proposed as a means of reducing pain in labour. The TENS unit emits low-voltage electrical impulses which vary in frequency and intensity. During labour, TENS electrodes are generally placed on the lower back, although TENS may be used to stimulate acupuncture points or other parts of the body. The physiological mechanisms whereby TENS relieves pain are uncertain. The TENS unit is frequently operated by women, which may increase sense of control in labour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 366 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 15%
Student > Master 51 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Researcher 23 6%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 122 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 17%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Psychology 12 3%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 130 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,359,545
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,855
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,203
of 107,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.