You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supporting people with pain-related distress in primary care consultations: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noureen A Shivji, Adam WA Geraghty, Hollie Birkinshaw, Tamar Pincus, Helen Johnson, Paul Little, Michael Moore, Beth Stuart, Carolyn A Chew-Graham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 47% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 23% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,438,034
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#695
of 4,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,746
of 444,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.