↓ Skip to main content

Statistical process control of mortality series in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) adult patient database: implications of the data generating process

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical process control of mortality series in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) adult patient database: implications of the data generating process
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

John L Moran, Patricia J Solomon, and for the ANZICS Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation (CORE) of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS)

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 43 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Engineering 4 9%
Psychology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#21,043,424
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2,015
of 2,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,289
of 208,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.