↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-2-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen M Norris, William A Ghali, P Diane Galbraith, Michelle M Graham, Louise A Jensen, Merril L Knudtson

Abstract

Although there have been substantial medical advances that improve the outcomes following cardiac ischemic events, gender differences in the treatment and course of recovery for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) continue to exist. There is a general paucity of data comparing the health related quality of life (HRQOL) in men and women undergoing treatment for CAD. The purpose of this study was to compare HRQOL outcomes of men and women in Alberta, at one-year following initial catheterization, after adjustment for known demographic, co-morbid, and disease severity predictors of outcome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Psychology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2013.
All research outputs
#10,032,232
of 12,538,284 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,085
of 1,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,509
of 142,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,538,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.