You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of facial massage, dry needling, and laser therapy in Temporomandibular Disorder: case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CoDAS, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017265 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Rodrigues Pessoa, Davidson Ribeiro Costa, Bruno de Moraes Prianti, David Ribeiro Costa, Carolina Alves Delpasso, Emília Ângela Lo Schiavo Arisawa, Renata Amadei Nicolau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,992,535
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#5
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,464
of 449,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them