↓ Skip to main content

Maintaining a Cognitive Map in Darkness: The Need to Fuse Boundary Knowledge with Path Integration

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maintaining a Cognitive Map in Darkness: The Need to Fuse Boundary Knowledge with Path Integration
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen Cheung, David Ball, Michael Milford, Gordon Wyeth, Janet Wiles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 97 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 34%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 26%
Neuroscience 15 14%
Psychology 11 10%
Computer Science 9 8%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,211
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,289
of 174,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#89
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.