↓ Skip to main content

Split Histidine Kinases Enable Ultrasensitivity and Bistability in Two-Component Signaling Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Split Histidine Kinases Enable Ultrasensitivity and Bistability in Two-Component Signaling Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Munia Amin, Steven L. Porter, Orkun S. Soyer

Abstract

Bacteria sense and respond to their environment through signaling cascades generally referred to as two-component signaling networks. These networks comprise histidine kinases and their cognate response regulators. Histidine kinases have a number of biochemical activities: ATP binding, autophosphorylation, the ability to act as a phosphodonor for their response regulators, and in many cases the ability to catalyze the hydrolytic dephosphorylation of their response regulator. Here, we explore the functional role of "split kinases" where the ATP binding and phosphotransfer activities of a conventional histidine kinase are split onto two distinct proteins that form a complex. We find that this unusual configuration can enable ultrasensitivity and bistability in the signal-response relationship of the resulting system. These dynamics are displayed under a wide parameter range but only when specific biochemical requirements are met. We experimentally show that one of these requirements, namely segregation of the phosphatase activity predominantly onto the free form of one of the proteins making up the split kinase, is met in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. These findings indicate split kinases as a bacterial alternative for enabling ultrasensitivity and bistability in signaling networks. Genomic analyses reveal that up 1.7% of all identified histidine kinases have the potential to be split and bifunctional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Engineering 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,528
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,130
of 207,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#89
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.