You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ovarian vein thrombosis and mirror syndrome in association with sacrococcygeal teratoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, April 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322010000400017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hasan Kafali, Yüksel Arıkan Onaran, Esra Keskin, Umut Sari, Ismail Kirbas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 60% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,668,648
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#60
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,651
of 103,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.