↓ Skip to main content

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004434.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Liu, Junmin Chen, Yanqiu Gao, Bao Deng, Kunshen Liu

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Other 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 28 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,525,060
of 12,852,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,540
of 10,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,519
of 144,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,852,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.