You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004434.pub5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chao Liu, Junmin Chen, Yanqiu Gao, Bao Deng, Kunshen Liu |
Abstract |
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 22% |
Unknown | 35 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,495
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.