↓ Skip to main content

Qué hacen los hospitales y la atención primaria para mitigar el impacto social de los eventos adversos graves

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qué hacen los hospitales y la atención primaria para mitigar el impacto social de los eventos adversos graves
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Joaquín Mira, Irene Carrillo, Susana Lorenzo

Abstract

To explore what hospitals and primary care (PC) are doing to reduce the negative social impact of a serious adverse event (AE). We surveyed 195 hospital (n=113) and PC (n=82) managers from eight autonomous communities to explore the level of implementation of five interventions recommended after an AE to protect the reputation of healthcare institutions. Most institutions (70, 45.2% PC, and 85, 54.8% hospitals) did not have a crisis plan to protect their reputation after an AE. Internal (p=0.0001) and external (p=0.012) communications were addressed better in PC than in hospitals. Very few institutions had defined the managers' role in case of an AE (10.7% hospitals versus 6.25% PC). A majority of healthcare institutions have not planned crisis intervention after an AE with severe consequences nor have they defined plans to recover citizens' trust after an AE.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Psychology 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 23 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,950,025
of 12,519,100 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#248
of 479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,381
of 284,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,519,100 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 479 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.