You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the Role and Impact of Poly (Ethylene Glycol) (PEG) on Nanoparticle Formulation: Implications for COVID-19 Vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.882363 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esperanza Padín-González, Pearl Lancaster, Massimo Bottini, Paolo Gasco, Lang Tran, Bengt Fadeel, Terence Wilkins, Marco P. Monopoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,947,828
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#749
of 8,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,849
of 450,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#36
of 646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,651 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.