↓ Skip to main content

IPCC emission scenarios: How did critiques affect their quality and relevance 1990–2022?

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IPCC emission scenarios: How did critiques affect their quality and relevance 1990–2022?
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102538
Authors

Jiesper Tristan Strandsbjerg Pedersen, Detlef van Vuuren, Joyeeta Gupta, Filipe Duarte Santos, Jae Edmonds, Rob Swart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 43 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 45 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,926,464
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#757
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,951
of 444,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.