You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long Term Suboxone™ Emotional Reactivity As Measured by Automatic Detection in Speech
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0069043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Hill, David Han, Pierre Dumouchel, Najim Dehak, Thomas Quatieri, Charles Moehs, Marlene Oscar-Berman, John Giordano, Thomas Simpatico, Debmalya Barh, Kenneth Blum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,348,632
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,616
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,416
of 195,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#771
of 4,752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.