↓ Skip to main content

Avoid opening up the Pandora’s box: treaty parallelism, termination and survival in the reform of the China–EU investment regime

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Law Review, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avoid opening up the Pandora’s box: treaty parallelism, termination and survival in the reform of the China–EU investment regime
Published in
Asia Pacific Law Review, June 2022
DOI 10.1080/10192557.2022.2085415
Authors

Keer Huang, Tong Qi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,543,618
of 21,422,252 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Law Review
#4
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,330
of 234,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Law Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,422,252 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them