↓ Skip to main content

Gain and loss of TASK3 channel function and its regulation by novel variation cause KCNK9 imprinting syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gain and loss of TASK3 channel function and its regulation by novel variation cause KCNK9 imprinting syndrome
Published in
Genome Medicine, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13073-022-01064-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margot A. Cousin, Emma L. Veale, Nikita R. Dsouza, Swarnendu Tripathi, Robyn G. Holden, Maria Arelin, Geoffrey Beek, Mir Reza Bekheirnia, Jasmin Beygo, Vikas Bhambhani, Martin Bialer, Stefania Bigoni, Cyrus Boelman, Jenny Carmichael, Thomas Courtin, Benjamin Cogne, Ivana Dabaj, Diane Doummar, Laura Fazilleau, Alessandra Ferlini, Ralitza H. Gavrilova, John M. Graham, Tobias B. Haack, Jane Juusola, Sarina G. Kant, Saima Kayani, Boris Keren, Petra Ketteler, Chiara Klöckner, Tamara T. Koopmann, Teresa M. Kruisselbrink, Alma Kuechler, Laëtitia Lambert, Xénia Latypova, Robert Roger Lebel, Magalie S. Leduc, Emanuela Leonardi, Andrea M. Lewis, Wendy Liew, Keren Machol, Samir Mardini, Kirsty McWalter, Cyril Mignot, Julie McLaughlin, Alessandra Murgia, Vinodh Narayanan, Caroline Nava, Sonja Neuser, Mathilde Nizon, Davide Ognibene, Joohyun Park, Konrad Platzer, Céline Poirsier, Maximilian Radtke, Keri Ramsey, Cassandra K. Runke, Maria J. Guillen Sacoto, Fernando Scaglia, Marwan Shinawi, Stephanie Spranger, Ee Shien Tan, John Taylor, Anne-Sophie Trentesaux, Filippo Vairo, Rebecca Willaert, Neda Zadeh, Raul Urrutia, Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic, Michael T. Zimmermann, Alistair Mathie, Eric W. Klee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#654,447
of 22,551,053 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#123
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,010
of 345,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,551,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them